Monday, February 8th, 2010

The Colorful Past and Unwritten Future of Kirkland’s Totem Lake Mall – Part 3

21

Editor’s note: Brian Lutz, author of The Sledghammer – Version 2.0 blog, has agreed to share his research on the Totem Lake Mall with Kirkland Views. Brian has written this three-part article for us chronicling the mall’s past, present and possible future. 

The Future of Totem Lake Mall

Amid the ongoing decline of the Totem Lake Mall, the property was purchased by Developers Diversified Realty (DDR) in 2004 with an eye on redeveloping the property. An initial proposal for redevelopment was presented by DDR to the Kirkland City council in May of 2005, followed by a draft conceptual master plan presented to the Design Review board in September of that year (you can find a PDF of this plan here).

An updated version of the proposal was submitted to the DRB that November (link) and in January of 2006 a development agreement was approved by the Kirkland City Council. Since that time, the City has been awaiting submittal of a design review application for phase 1 of the redevelopment project and no further information is available. The City of Kirkland has a webpage that shows the current status of this, but aside from changing dates, there have been no updates to this page since January of 2006.

The original proposed site plan from 2005

The original proposed site plan from 2005

Under the original redevelopment proposal, the enclosed portion of the lower mall and the upper mall would be demolished and replaced. In an effort to improve the accessibility of the property and eliminate the separation between the two halves of the property, a new street was to be added through the middle of the former enclosed mall space, similar to the design of Redmond Town Center. In the lower mall portion of the property, the enclosed mall space was to be replaced by a number of smaller retail stores and 284 residential units. On the upper mall site plans called for several larger retail tenants, a six story office building and parking garage, and a movie theater.

Updated site plan, January 2008

Earlier this year, an updated site plan for the mall was posted on DDR’s webpage, reflecting a number of rather significant changes to the earlier site plan. The closures of the CompUSA and Rite Aid stores left that part of the mall vacant and unlikely to be reoccupied, so those structures would also be facing the wrecking ball under this plan, however the existing structures in the Northwest corner would still remain. In the upper mall, the changes are even more drastic. The office building and movie theater planned earlier have disappeared completely in this version, and the upper area is to be anchored by a 156,000 square foot major retailer (closer examination of the space shows details that strongly suggest that this might be a Target store) with multi-level parking above the store, and an 80,000 square foot multi-story anchor on the other side. In addition to these, this plan calls for a 45,000 square foot health club, and a number of smaller stores to fill in the rest of the space. The current Wells Fargo branch from the current mall would be relocated to a new structure in the parking lot of the lower mall, and the existing gas station and Shucks Auto Supply would both be replaced by new restaurants. Additional details on these two site plans can be found at this post on my Blog, which was made when this new site plan appeared on DDR’s webpage. Since that time, there have been a number of additional changes made to the plan.

The most recent site plan, from June 2008.  Click for a link to the PDF version.

The most recent site plan, from June 2008. Click for a link to the PDF version.

Back in July, yet another potential site plan for the mall was posted on DDR’s webpage. For this version, most of the property seems to have remained untouched from the prior version, although the health club has disappeared (although more recent rumors have suggested that the Parkplace location of 24 Hour Fitness may be looking to make a move to here when that site gets redeveloped) and the smaller of the two major retail spaces in the upper mall has changed into a 3 story structure with two 20,000 square foot spaces on the ground level and two stores of 40,000 square feet each above. The residential parking garages also seem to have received modification, adding room for a number of additional small retail spaces at the ground level. As with earlier versions, the Car Toys, Ross and Famous Footwear stores will remain as they are currently under this plan. Further analysis of this site plan and comparison to earlier versions can be found here.

Assuming that the Totem Lake redevelopment does actually take place at some undetermined point in the near future, I would be interested to know what people would like to see here. With many of the major malls in the area rapidly moving upscale, it seems to me that there is a void being left behind for a neighborhood center like Totem Lake to fill, although it is clear that in the mall’s current form it is not going to be able to fill that void. I have to admit that being from Redmond, I may not know as much about the Totem Lake, Juanita and Kingsgate neighborhoods as I probably should. Would the neighborhoods be best served by a one-stop place for people to do their weekly shopping? Would a community center concept like the one that has worked so well at Crossroads work here as well? Do people here want a fashion-filled shopping center in their neighborhood to save the trip up to Alderwood or down to Southcenter? Is there something completely different that would work best for these neighborhoods?

With all this in mind, what exactly does the future hold for the Totem Lake Mall? At this point, it is far from certain. So far, not a shovel has been lifted on the redevelopment of the property, and it has proven surprisingly difficult to find much information on when it will be, or what will actually be here when everything is said and done. Aside from a few two year old documents filed with the City of Kirkland and the two potential site plans that have been posted on DDR’s website, information has been virtually nonexistent. The latest information that I have on the project comes from a recent City Council meeting where it was stated that DDR is waiting to find more anchor tenants before they begin construction of the redeveloped property. In the meantime, it seems that the Totem Lake Mall as it currently stands is going nowhere, both literally and figuratively. In contrast to the ongoing controversy that has accompanied the proposed redevelopment of Parkplace in downtown Kirkland, thus far the Totem Lake redevelopment plan has been largely uncontroversial, presumably because it doesn’t really do anyone much good to have a big empty mall sitting in the middle of their neighborhood.

The Totem Lake Mall in its current state is a far cry from what it once was back when it opened in 1973. In spite of the decline of the property that is in evidence today, I have been surprised by how many good memories people who grew up in Kirkland during the Seventies and Eighties have of the mall in better times, back when it functioned as the heart of its neighborhood. With the right mix of tenants and the right design, it is entirely possible that once again, Kirkland’s children can grow up with fond memories of the times spent at Totem Lake. When exactly that time will come still remains to be seen.

See: The Colorful Past and Unwritten Future of Kirkland’s Totem Lake Mall – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3


Print This Article Print This Article

You might also like

The Future of Totem Lake – how the candidates view the issues
In an effort to provide a better understanding each of the eight candidates for Kirkland City Council...
The Colorful Past and Unwritten Future of Kirkland’s Totem Lake Mall – Part 1
Editor's note: Brian Lutz, author of The Sledghammer - Version 2.0 blog, has agreed to share his research...
The Colorful Past and Unwritten Future of Kirkland’s Totem Lake Mall – Part 2
Editor's note: Brian Lutz, author of The Sledghammer - Version 2.0 blog, has agreed to share his research...
The Future of Totem Lake – Joan McBride
By Joan McBride I believe that Totem Lake is both the biggest opportunity and the biggest challenge...

21 Responses to “The Colorful Past and Unwritten Future of Kirkland’s Totem Lake Mall – Part 3”
  1. Clifton says:

    Totem Lake needs to become the center for activity it never was. The plans look good but they are old and it doesn’t look like progress is being made. I want to see a Crossroads Mall community place or a University Village style mall. It would save me a lot of time driving if it were built. Keep Trader joes and Schuck’s and scrap the rest.
    Cliff

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Earnoseandthrow says:

    The totem lake mall has great potential for making this eyesore become a hive of activity because it has visibility from the freeway and a new transit center, near the hospital and a new freeway intersection. There must be something else going on to prevent this from moving forward. I heard city officials praise this planned mall a few years ago like it was the greatest thing since electricity. I think it is needed in our neighborhood adn I support it.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Erika says:

    I would love to see several things, and I am not sure all of them are compatible with each other. =)

    1. The mall should become a place where the community would gather. I don’t just want to shop there, I want it to be a reasonable place to go when I am out for a walk.

    2. I want the new space to support local businesses. Yes, having some anchor stores is necessary to draw people in, but what I really want to see is more local businesses and services. (Maybe one of the dozen salons in downtown Kirkland can move there. =)

    3. Yes, I know that open space is the latest and greatest trend, but I would like to see a little less of it. I love those outdoor spaces in the summer, but we live in Seattle. In the winter all those lovely outdoor benches go unused, and visitors have to crowd covered walkways or dash between dry spots. Use some open spaces and a mix of skylights and windows instead.

    4. Reuse the existing space as much as possible. I thought that the skylights and timbered ceilings of the original mall seemed nice. It seems a pity to completely destroy this and build something new when the environmental impact could be decreased by reusing some of the space.

    5. Sky bridge between the upper and lower mall.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Tia says:

    I would like to see a community meeting place like Crossroads or Third Place Books in Lake Forest Park. Give people a place to eat, hear some music, peruse magazines at a big newsstand, play chess, learn a new language, sample a new wine, hold a meeting in a pleasant community room, and shop, too. I realize a new bookstore is unrealistic in this age of Amazon but it seems to be a vital part of the success at LFP. We go there to meet authors, we eat dinner, stay for the band, and take home books and magazines (and all too often a slice of cake) that we may not have purchased had our visits been shorter or more utilitarian. Don’t let the message be simply “Buy/eat something and go home.” Architecture plays a big part in that.

    I absolutely vote for Target. That would fill a void in this town. I would like to point out that we achieved a tiny inroad recently when socks became available on Lake Street. There is a new shoe store (sorry, don’t know the name) that carries Smartwool socks, the actual greatest thing since electricity.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. David Wall says:

    If the train tracks were turned into a bike/pedestrian path, people could actually walk, run and bike to the new mall. How’s that for building a community, especially for the kids who have nothing fun to do in town.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. KellyDawn says:

    The gallery on Central is also leaving after 16 years. Gunnar Nordstrom is leaving after 17 years. Hmmmmm… I guess our sales pitch that Kirkland are a gallery hub is shot. I hope that Totem Lake Mall can help revive Kirkland’s sad retail environment.

    New sales pitch for downtown: Overpriced retail space available. Hostile business environment and rudderless city government fosters angry residents. Disregard vacancy signs in neighboring windows. Bonus: Stay in business longer than 6 months and win a free raffle ticket to support city services. No signage needed due to low foot traffic.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. Hank3429 says:

    Does anyone know if there will there be a theater again? I am not a big fan of Bollywood shows so I am hoping for a new theater.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. Yarn says:

    Tia,
    I don’t see any sort of meeting place in the drawing presented here. I share your concerns and I also would appreciate such a venue for the arts. With the parkplace project winding its way through the city halls, this project would seem to be doomed unless it targets an entirely separate retail market. My assumption is that parkplace would get higher rents being downtown. If Target is an anchor in totem lake then what is the other anchor to be? Walmart would compete with Target. KMart the same. Some clothing store perhaps. Is totem lake inside the 5 mile dead zone around Belle Square? It would be nice if it were not.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. Nice work Rob & Brian.
    It seems the last we’ve heard anything on this was when the DDR crew flew in from Beechwood and hobnobbed with the dozens of bankers and real estate folks at that Bellevue bowling alley on June 18 –where I saw Jeremy McMahan, Jon Regala, and one of the guys from Touchstone. If anyone has heard anything new from that presentation, I’m all ears (I wondered, when the DDR VP took a spill on the waxed bowling-lane wood floor during question-time, if that was a sign).
    I don’t think they had locked TJ’s in at that point, but they seemed pretty certain. They also have several other tenants locked-in. It’s all about those “anchor” stores — looks like they still haven’t got Target to come on board?
    Bankruptcies of several anchor-type retailers in recent months, as well as the current crisis in the credit markets is undoubtedly having an effect here at Totem Lake Malls. Until they get those tenants, like Dave Ramsay said, “finish their mating-dance ritual,” the development is going NOWHERE.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  10. Brian Lutz says:

    If I had to speculate on what kind of anchor tenants they might be looking for, I’m pretty sure Target is one of them (Kmart closed down its Bellevue store six years ago and that one has sat vacant ever since then, and Walmart has a store in Lynwood already,) and I’d guess for the other one they’d be looking for something like a Macy’s or a Kohl’s type department store. There’s already a new Target store in the works at Factoria Mall in Bellevue to replace the existing one (although I’m beginning to think that one’s been hit by economy-related delays as well.)
    It sounds like DDR was targeting a 2011 completion date for the project, but with the way the economy seems to be headed, at this point I’d be surprised if they even started by 2011…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  11. Allen says:

    Any idea how many susidized rental units are planned for this project. I heard Joan McBride say they gave concessions to this project so they would build it. These buildings don’t look very tall so I wonder what the concessions were. They should allow buildings the same height as the hospital if they really want to promote urban living and increase density. These half measures don’t solve the problems we have.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  12. Smith says:

    I think this is a pipe dream. Nothing will be built here for years and the city should look in other places to find more tax dollars. If Kirkland ParkPlace is built in to a mall then the chance of Totem Lake being built up is even lower. What this town needs is a top to bottom reform iwth economic growth as the #1 priority. I think that for too long Kirkland has focused on every whim that has come along at the expense of long term economic development. Now the whole place is hemorrhaging money and they are looking to do anything they can to save their butts. Hire economists or better yet, elect an economist to city council! That is what we need.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  13. Juanita Neighbor says:

    My dreams for Totem Lake Mall are Target, Borders, Home Depot and Red Robin. Currently Kirkland has no department store, no hardware store, and Park Place Books is sadly declining beyond the point of no return. Right now, the city of Kirkland gets no business revenue from its own citizens when they shop for most items as we have to go to Redmond or Woodinville to find them. Unfortunately I don’t see the redevelopment happening soon. The current economic climate makes expansion less likely for a lot of chains. Still, a discounter like Target might do well in hard times. We can hope!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  14. Gail says:

    I wish this would hurry up and get built because we need some shopping options that are close by. What my fear is is that what is going to be built will end up like the Target at Northgate. That Target is in a big ugly mixed use building and it isn’t an appealing store.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Brian Lutz says:

      Given the fact that the plan is calling for a 156,000 square foot store (, I seriously doubt we’re going to end up with anything close to Northgate North (I have to agree with you on that one, the place is a crowded mess.) The Target there is about half the size of any of the ones on this side of the lake (2 stories of about 40-60k square feet each, if I had to guess, plus a Best Buy store below it)) It’s not like there wasn’t room to build there (the space right next to it is just parking lots,) but if I had to guess, the cost of land and growth management act requirements are probably responsible for cramming all this stuff into a single city block. The Totem Lake Target does appear to have some space constraints, but it looks like these will be dealt with by putting the parking for the upper mall above the Target store, although the store itself should be on the large side for a Target store (the Super Target stores run about 175k square feet, but there aren’t any of those in Washington currently.
      Either way, I don’t think you have anything to be worried about here.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Cami Keyes says:

      That Target Building was built by Touchstone…the company wanting to build Parkplace. Makes one wonder what we are in for Downtown. That building is the only mixed use building every built by Touchstone, according to their web site.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Tia says:

        With 27 public meetings so far we don’t really need to wonder. It isn’t like they are doing this under the cover of darkness. Regardless, stacking big box stores isn’t in the cards for either TL or PP.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  15. The Ghost of Peter Kirk says:

    With the current state of the economy, I am not very hopeful for any development activity at the mall very soon.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  16. Hank3429 says:

    I don’t think the Northgate Mall example is a good one because it is very different from Totem Lake. And Parkplace also is different even if it is the same builder. The difference is the design requirement s of the city. I think we can all look at the NOrthgate Target store and see an eyesore. That is what Seattle allowed to be built. Kirkland wont allow any such thing because we have lots of processes which so many of you on this blog write about. Even if we have problems to fix in the process atleast we know the process wont make a building like Northgate’s.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Tell us what you're thinking...


COMMENTING RULES: We welcome your comments and encourages you to join in the conversation as a part of our community. In an effort to maintain the high quality of shared community information on this site, we require all participants to abide by the following Code of Conduct.