Op-Ed | How should Kirkland pay for the Eastside Rail Corridor?

View from Houghton

Citizen opinion survey provides “quick read” on preferred ways to pay for the “Kirkland Segment”

 

Authored by City of Kirkland Council Members Dave Asher and Amy Walen

 

Kirkland is on a path to buy the “Kirkland Segment” of the Eastside Rail Corridor as a first-step in completing the long-planned cross-Kirkland Trail.  Faced with possibilities that the corridor might be sold off piecemeal to speculators or others, Kirkland negotiated an extremely favorable price ($5 million for 5.75 miles) that will ensure our community can plan the future of nearly 6 miles of prime real estate.  As we go through our “due diligence” investigation prior to completing the purchase, we would like your opinion on preferred ways to pay for the corridor.  Below, is a web page where you can provide your input.

The trail winds through eight Kirkland neighborhoods from Totem Lake in the north down to Lake View and Houghton in the south.

 

In December, the City Council voted unanimously to investigate the purchase because the Corridor is a wise investment in Kirkland’s economy and quality of life.  The segment instantly links many of Kirkland’s schools and parks and will become a region-wide attraction for cyclists and pedestrians of all ages.  Future transit and trail use will help provide alternatives to cars and help relieve congestion on our north-south arterials such as Lake Washington Boulevard and 132nd Avenue NE.  Although the cross-Kirkland trail has long been part of the City’s vision, this is the first time the opportunity to purchase the corridor has ever been available.

 

The corridor  has real value to our economy and property values.  The segment starts in the south in our newly up-zoned Yarrow Bay Business District which we expect to attract jobs and housing due to its strategic location near SR 520. It ends in the Totem Lake business district.  Recently we asked the Urban Land Institute (ULI) to recommend what more Kirkland could do to improve the Totem Lake neighborhood and prepare for a time when the mall is developed.  ULI’s top recommendation called for gaining control and developing the rail corridor as an economic development investment.

 

A senior Google executive also walked part of the corridor recently with Kirkland staff and expressed strong interest in the City’s purchase, saying it would make Kirkland much more attractive as a place for Google to stay and expand.

Cottonwood Park is in the distance down the rail road tracks. Norkirk Neighborhood to the left, The Highlands to the right.

 

For a price of $5 million, Kirkland would gain control of 5 ¾ miles of corridor that generally is 100 feet wide and remarkably suitable for side-by-side development of pedestrian and bicycle trails, as well as potential for future transit development.  At this stage, we are focused on securing the property.  Plans for development will be undertaken in the future.

 

The Council took action for all these reasons: jobs, health, transportation and quality of life.  Now we need your input.  We will pay for the purchase with an interfund loan that must be repaid within three years. There are trade-offs in any financial arrangement.  Three options to repay the loan have been developed and the City Council would like Kirkland residents to share their preference by taking a three-question online survey at www.kirklandwa.gov/eastsiderailcorridor.  These survey results are not statistically valid but they will give the Council a sense of public sentiment.

 

We appreciate your input by Monday, February 20.

About Rob Butcher

Editor and Scribbler of Kirkland Views.

, ,

  • Per-Ola

    Great to see Council Members Asher and Walen reach out to the larger community, and also clearly state that “These survey results are not statistically valid but they will give the Council a sense of public sentiment”. 

    I guess in these financially tough(er) times, there will be a lot of opposition against any funding of a corridor purchase. But sometimes leading is just that, leading and go against the current “state of emotion” and dare to look far forward – even though it might not be very popular at the moment.

    If we only followed the short term sentiment, we would have no parks, no schools, no infrastructure, as the benefits are not always immediately obvious, but “we” are still stuck paying for them.
    Heck, I have no kids, but still “stuck” paying for schools…:-)

    I’ve been a supporter for rail-bound transportation on this corridor, but impressed by the Council’s leadership on this issue – even it it turns out to only result in a “simple” walking trail as long as I have the chance to enjoy the corridor.

    We elect leaders to lead, and leading sometimes mean taking unpopular decisions, and have the guts to publicly defend visions for the future.

    • Jeanne Large

      Thank you for your comments.  This is a good time for us to support our community and its future.  This is an important decision for our leaders to consider and make.  This is an affordable, reasonable investment. 

      • Anonymous

        Affordable? And if it cost $10 mil to buy the property and convert it to a usable walking path… would that be affordable? I agree that it is our city council who decides what the people can afford and which straw will break the tax payer’s back.

        Oh, and those road crossings… we can’t leave up the rail signals for every pedestrian… street lights? Or worse, expecting folks to look both ways before crossing. Can we afford that?

    • Jim Hitter

      Per-Ola,
      Very well put.

  • Anonymous

    I was rereading the survey options on the city website…. in option 3, park bonds, this caught my eye… They already have a “taskforce” working on selling a new parks bond to the new and much larger voter base of Kirkland… Oh my, this ought to be good… let your city spend their way to your good health… and property values will rise for those of you lucky enough to still own a home in Kirkland. (Or so they think.)

    A citizen-based Park Funding Exploratory Committee has been tasked with identifying funding options to help meet the capital, maintenance, and operational needs of the City’s park, open space and recreation system and to make recommendations to the City Council about a park bond measure. 

    • Jim Hitter

      RosesWA,

      We get what you’re saying–you don’t want a trail on the unused tracks.  Or, maybe you just want one if someone else pays for it.

      • Anonymous

        I want an honest discussion… how much to actually turn this property into a usable trail park? I must assume it will be a whole lot more than the initial purchase price.

        And if we don’t want to take money from our fellow city voters, folks we know are in dire straits financially, then using taxes already promised, the parks money, makes sense… and if we use that money then what are we giving up in the parks dept to pay for the trail?

        We’re talking about the use of the People’s Credit, and personally, I have a preference for avoiding long term credit for things I don’t need.